Excerpting Mr Robinson

I felt very lucky today to have been raised in a non-mashup culture as I listened to Sir Ken Robinson‘s excellent presentation on Changing Education Paradigms (no links yet — wait for it…).

I first watched the RSA Animation of his talk at YouTube. I recognized the animator’s style (I’m still trying to figure out what artist that arm represents) from a previous RSA Animation, Philip Zimbardo’s The Secret Power of Time. This time, I looked away from the screen as I took notes.

When I watched Zimbardo, I had to do it twice. I found the cartooning at first fascinating, then annoying, and ultimately distracting. The cartoonist has his/her own take on the presentation, and draws very appropriate animations, but they have their own interpretation. So this time, watching Sr Ken, I focused on my own notes, creating my own interpretation of the talk instead.

Then it stopped. At first I thought YouTube had stopped streaming, but no, it was over. I looked at my notes, and sensed something wrong. It seemed to have been cut off. So I went looking to see if I could find the whole presentation, assuming there was in fact a whole one somewhere. I found it at about the same time Dr Couros responded to my tweet.

The whole speech is here. When I viewed it, I learned a number of things:

  • The context for Mr Robinson’s remarks was a global crisis in human resources that he sees as reflecting the ecological crisis. I learned about idea of the Anthropocene age, as a new geological era dominated by manmade systems. I heard him connect the teen suicide rates to this crisis. I was able to begin to connect some dots about teen suicide, the internet, and a larger context of global change.
  • I learned that he lived in California, and sees Las Vegas as a place of pure imagination, because it has no geographic or economic reason to exist, which gave me a different perspective on cities in general.
  • At the start of his talk, he told me what the RSA was. The organization goes way back to the Enlightement and was not only the Royal Society of Arts, but of Manufacturing and Commerce as well. Manufacturing and commerce are two of my historical interests. I went to the RSA website, and discovered that they are a wonderful island of rationalism in an increasingly irrational world.
  • He mentioned Chris Woodhead, so I looked him up on Wikipedia and discovered that he was the Chief Inspector of Schools and a believer in traditional education.
  • In my (and his) generation, we used to remove people’s tonsils unnecessarily, because it was the medical fad at the time. Most people my age (and his) are tonsil-less. He connected this fact to the current trend for medicating ADHD, which has been a concern of mine for some time. I have long felt that most children given the medication should be allowed to go play instead of sit still.

The point is, I would have learned none of this if I had only watched the animation, which had excerpted certain parts of this talk. Did someone edit his talk to the parts they thought would create a good animation? was the goal to create the animation, or to create a shorter version for those with shorter attention spans? Robinson’s points were easy to follow, yet the drawing seemed designed to make it easy for us to follow them. Kind of fed into his ADHD argument, I thought.

The content of his talk was more complete within its context than excerpted from it. The animation was essentially a mashup, not a presentation by Sir Ken. It left out much of his humor, his personal environment, the global motive for challenging educational paradigms, his books, and the observation that teenagers don’t wear wristwatches. These were replaced with delightful, if distracting, cartooning.

The experience reminded me of the argument in music about dissecting albums, where some bands don’t want their albums, which are constructed so that songs are heard in a particular order, dismantled by people downloading individual songs. I see the value in both the individual song (in this case, the animation) and the whole album (his entire talk), but I don’t want them to be confused. If you’d like to see his whole talk, enjoy!

This entry was posted in Musings, Responses. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Excerpting Mr Robinson

  1. Alan Levine says:

    I had a very similar reaction. At first “wow this is neat” but then, “it feels gimmicky”. Sir Ken mentions a word, and the camera pans, down to the corner, and all fo a sudden there is a complete drawing there instantly. And, when it pulls back to show the overview, its really not an overview of the whole talk, just what they animated.

    My hunch is that its very time consuming to do this, because it is done after the fact; this is very different approach to something the visual notetaking my colleague does (http://ninmah.be/) and others who do this (http://ifvp.org/) which is done in real time; so they capture a visual recording of an entire session.

    I might be okay with an excerpt, if were really clear what it was, if what the context was. On the video page all it says is “was adapted from a talk” – it does not provide a link to the original, and unless one really toggles open the YouTube caption section, you’d assume it was the whole talk.

    Making an adaption of a whole took some editorial license; and like you, I think this needs to be much more explicit.

    • llane says:

      Alan, Rachel’s notes are fascinating — the kind of thing I would do if I could draw. I did a notetaking experiment with my students where I had them do a page of Cornell-style notes, then the next lecture a more graphic style, but most were just bubbles rather than conceptual drawings like this.

      Drawings like these and at the IFVP site seem to affirm the idea that visual recording is more than recording – it is clearly a record, but only for the note-taker, and is highly interpretive.

  2. Ed Webb says:

    You can read some of my students’ reactions to the animated version on their blogs here: http://www.google.com/reader/bundle/user/02949324672354748984/bundle/FYSM%20Science%20Friction More to come over the next few days. Comments welcome, of course!

    • llane says:

      Ed, that’s really wonderful that you have them blogging. It helps me just to read what they have to say, and how they say it, compared to my own students.

      • Emily Bowie says:

        Ed posted this in his Diigo and I was just looking over it. I’m one of the students in his class and I was struck by your reaction. Personally, I think that the drawing, while it does only provide one perception, is still valuable. As a student it would be rare for me to find 55 minutes to watch his whole talk, and so the 10 minute excerpt was enough to get me thinking. At the same time, the way the drawings are created keeps me focused on what is being said and how it ties to his message, I found it helpful, as a student, to my comprehension. I do agree, however, that the speech as a whole is very valuable, and that it should have been mentioned in the excerpt that there was a larger resource.

        • llane says:

          Emily, I just noticed that the drawings seemed to create a different interpretation, though, then just watching him speak (with his own gestures, etc.).

  3. Tomaz Lasic says:

    Just another reminder of how often we forget that information itself has no meaning – it is us who give IT meaning.

    Great post Lisa, thanks for digging deeper…

  4. Mike N says:

    I also enjoyed watching the entire presentation by Sir Ken, it was just more complete. The animation was excellent as is the message, but it certainly is more meaningful its entirety. Your comment about music is why Pink FLoyd does not want Dark Side of the Moon on iTunes as separate songs – good analogy!

  5. Pingback: Tweets that mention Excerpting Mr Robinson | Lisa's EC&I831 Blog -- Topsy.com