TechEd #2: Quick Multimedia

Nanda Ganesan of Cal State LA gave a presentation on “Rapid Development of Multimedia Modules” in which he demonstrated not only good presentation technique (I took heed since I am presenting April 20 at Miramar!) but great information on how to quickly create enriching materials.

The goal is simulating the in-class experience as closely as possible. I was gratified to hear Dr. Ganesan refer to PowerPoint with narration as “sleeping aids with no side effects”, since I consider most of them to be the 21st century version of film strips. He did not reject PP entirely, however, and part of his demonstration showed how one could use a webcam to create video inside PP.

What most impressed me was his use of a “smartpad”. Using Camtasia and an electronic pen (Seiko’s $99 Inklink), Dr G created quick presentation diagrams (his sample was a computer network), explaining as he drew. This gave spontaneity to what was obviously a recorded presentation. In my classes, there are certain lectures where I use a chalkboard (really!), such as my childish (but creepy) sequence on the development of trench warfare in WWI and my diagram of the Iran-Contra scandal connections. These would be quite effective online using this technique, much more so than the still diagrams I use instead.

Throughout the demonstration (and he let the audience choose demonstration rather than presentation — very on-the-fly!), Dr G showed basic setup of big programs like Camtasia, Captivate and Snagit (I would use $69 Snapz on my Mac instead). His point was that only a few settings need be changed to get started and create something FAST. This made getting started look much less daunting for workshop attendees! Plus, the product one creates doing things quickly adds that spontaneity that helps recreate the classroom experience.

So I got a good lesson on how to present a workshop (do what the audience wants), good reasons for creating units on the fly (which I tend to do anyway), and ways to make a “how to” workshop more effective (show just a few key things and make it look easy).

TechEd #1: Wikis

Debbie Faires of San Jose State University helped me understand some good uses for wikis. I currently use wikis only for quiz development (students add and edit questions, from which I choose for the quiz if they do enough work!). I began this last year using pbwiki (see the original wiki we made by using “history103” as the password). Now I use the wiki inside of Moodle.

Debbie noted that some of the best wikis have WYSIWYG editors, like Seedwiki which has a formatting bar instead of code. For most wikis, you must know the syntax to create links. She was fond of Google Docs, where each user is color coded for easy reference, and the wiki opens automatically in edit view. Flickr, I was reminded, can be used to have students annotate images easily, as a collaborative project. And Bubbleshare (which I learned about at a WOW2 podcast) can create slideshows to share. Debbie also reintroduced me to Zoho.com, which has chat and show applications as well as wikis.

One use is document creation collaboration among faculty. It is recommended that one not use the word “wiki”. I already violated this tenet when MiraCosta developed its Technology Plan in a wiki on my advice, using the defunct schtuff.com, now absorbed by pbwiki. I realize now that more people would have been less afraid to use the sucker if I’d called it a “collaborative document” or just “a document we can all edit”.

But the most fascinating aspect of the presentation was the usage tips. Here’s what I can do with a wiki:
* Appointment signup — everyone can see everyone else’s time slots, and sign up for meetings or office hours
* Ongoing collections — sustained collections of information that stay and are updated from semester to semester
* Podcast editing — students add time markers to class podcasts to make it easier for all students to scan to a particular topic
* Assignment sharing — students add their assignment and all appear on one page, making a large document collection
* User guides — students creating user guides (to the Course Management System, for example) to help other students
* Student book reviews — students can share individual readings with others
* Lecture links — students can create and update links that have gone down or moved
* Spreadsheet creation — the online form of each student or group giving a report on one aspect, but all are responsible for learning the whole thing (the example was each group being assigned a particular nation and reporting on working conditions)
* Resource page — student-created and edited collection of readings

One instructor assigned students to report individually on the conglomerated knowledge represented in the wiki, and assigned individual grades this way.

Debbies presentation wiki (of course!) can be found at TechEdWiki.pbwiki.com.

Conference mania!

First, there’s TechEd in Ontario, CA next week. For some reason, the College Board extended an invitation, and MiraCosta faculty can attend for free (a $256 value). Too bad they didn’t do that before a bunch of folks paid, but what the heck.

Then, there’s the TCC 2007 Worldwide Online conference out of Hawai’i, April 17-19. Early registration ($69) has been extended through the end of March. The program is huge!

Immediately after that, I am presenting at the Online Best Practices Showcase & Expo conference at Miramar College, Friday April 20 from 12-5 pm. (All area college instructors — it’s free! no pre-registration either!) My topic is “Interactivity and Learning Styles”. It will be loosely based on my workshop Online Teaching and Learning Styles. Well, very loosely. In fact, I’m not sure what I want to do yet! Any suggestions?

If this were a more personal blog I’d ask, “and what should I wear???”

IOC pre-conference

I “attended” the online pre-conference for the Illinois Online Conference coming up in two weeks. “The Not So Extreme Course Makeover Clinic” (see webcast) was intriguing not so much in its content as in its form. The pre-conference effectively utilized the Elluminate conferencing software, which I find vastly superior to the CCCConfer we have access to here. I have found Elluminate easy to use on multiple platforms, and very flexible from a participant standpoint (I have never presented on it). With 75 participants, organization was crucial, and we were immediately broken into groups. A table was shown with categories: Student-Student, Student-Instructor and Student-Content. Each category had two squares, one for those who had an idea to offer and one for those wanting help. We each typed our name into a square, and the moderators separated us into groups. It was quick, painless and synchronous. Participants (some from Australia and Scotland) could use voice, text or both. Although not suitable for any asynchronous use, it was online synchronicity at its most effective.