History 104: Western Civilization since 1648

Grading

Points Chart | Outcomes | Rubric | Cheating & Plagiarism

The course is graded on a simple 100-point scale. Without extra credits, that's a simple percentage (i.e. each quiz is worth 10% of the grade).

Points Chart Points
Quizzes (7 at 10 points each)
These contain multiple-choice questions and essay.
70
Participation Assessments (2 at 10 points each)
Based on self-assessments supported by the Participation portion of the Rubric (below).

20 
Final examination
A comprehensive essay exam.
10
Extra credit
?
TOTAL
100+

Student Learning Outcomes

At the end of the course, students will be able to:
1. construct a historical thesis that could be supported by selected primary sources from the era covered by the course
2. estimate the correct era from which a primary source derives
3. articulate the causal and/or consequential elements of an event from the era covered by the course
4. analyze cultural expressions as evidence of an historical theme

Course Grading Rubric

Grade Quizzes and Final Exam Participation Overall

A

 

90-100%

 

Essay answers on quizzes have made full use of class materials. Final exam shows full understanding of material at the analytical level -- evidence that you can apply historical knowledge. Essays emphasize broad trends in history and themes are appropriate and well-explained. Logs into class at least three times a week, posts twice a week and on time, focus kept on questions as they develop, good response to instructor guidance, helpful to other students, excellent sources posted in forums, quality posts contain excellent theses, relate to course materials and indicate extensive or intensive reflection about the issues. Use of sources and facts is extensive. Throughout the course, work and discussion posts have been of high quality and satisfy or exceed the number of contributions.

B

80-89%

 

Essay answers on quizzes have made good use of class materials. Final exam uses sources and facts at a highly interpretive level. Logs into class at least twice a week, usually posts twice per week and on time, mostly responds to instructor guidance, helpful to other students, very good sources posted in forums, very good theses, posts usually relate to course materials and indicate some reflection about the issues. Shows ample understanding of assigned work at the analytical or deeply interpretive level -- evidence that you can apply historical knowledge. Throughout the course, work and discussion posts have been of high quality and satisfy the number of contributions.

C

70-79%

 

Essay answers on quizzes may have been factual in nature, but well-supported. Or essays may have been at a high level but examples were not supported with detail. Logs in about twice per week, posts at least once per week, typically posts during the same week, occasionally helpful to and rarely distracts other students, posts good sources and factual theses, which occasionally relate to course materials and indicates a modest amount of reflection. Shows understanding of interpretive nature of historical events, and how they connect to each other. May lack deep understanding of these events, or the trends they represent. Throughout the course, work and discussion posts have been of average quality and sufficient quantity, but not fulfilling the total requirement.

D

60-69%

Essay answers on quizzes have missed significant points from class materials, or have not been answered. Use of sources is superficial, or completely factual. Logs in irregularly, posts less than once per week, doesn't usually post on time, rarely helpful to other students, posts indicate pat responses and little reflection. Demonstrates a superficial or purely factual understanding of content. May show some memorization or basic familiarity with events, but no understanding of the significance of these events or how they can be seen in a context outside their own timeframe. Discussion posts did not contribute new perspectives or utilize class content.

F

59% and below

There may be little use of sources or facts in essay answers, or a number not answered at all. Final exam fails to connect ideas from throughout the class. Rarely logs in, has just a few posts, often not on time, no help to other students, posts do not add to general discussion and indicate little or not reflection. Demonstrates no understanding of events from the textbook, and little name recognition of any details.

Cheating
Academic dishonesty can lead to F grades on quizzes, participation assessments (as a result of plagiarism in discussion forums), and the final exam. If cheating or plagiarism is discovered at any time (and I'm very good at it), all of the student's previous work will be checked, and grades revised as determined by the instructor. Cheating includes copying phrasing or paraphrasing from the textbook, documents, or other course materials without quoting and/or citing the source. It also includes creating work together with another person (see Indiana University's plagiarism self-quiz). While you are welcome to study and talk together, all work you turn in or post must be your own, since all grades are individual.
To protect yourself in an on-line environment, make sure that your quiz/test answers in no way resemble those of your colleagues.

 

 

Top